Some thoughts on screenwriting
The screenwriter occupies an unusual space. He (or she) is essential, writing the words that convey and define if not how, then what will be told in a given stretch of celluloid. The director develops the action and sometimes, audaciously, seems to create a singular vision from the pulp and clay of the story. But where is the story but with the screenwriter? And yet, some would have him be a kind of glorified storyboardist, rather than a key player in the persistent conflict between author and auteur.
While there is some truth to the belief that a good director can elevate a mediocre script into a great movie, and a great script can seldom survive in the fumbling hands of a bad director, this is not a dig at the screenwriter. Rather, it highlights the inequities of a system that takes power away from the story-weaver and puts it in the hands of the story-teller. In a perfect world there would be some semblance of equality; a synergy between the director and writer and a realization that writer and illustrator are natural peers.
As it stands, the pinnacle of achievement for the screenwriter is often to be or become a director himself (Tarantino, Linklater, Aranofsky, Lynch). And maybe this is the only way: to take the reins which he has been formerly lashed and claim control of his storytelling. But this lofty goal aside, I would like to think the ideal would be a great collaboration: screenwriters who pair directors who feed each other with mutual vision, respect, and dedication, and thus build something beautiful together out of light and sound, color, character, and words. (There are some writers who manage this – Charlie Kaufman and Robert Towne come to mind – but the current system makes it harder, not easier for the next generation of Kaufmans to fight their way out of being permanent journeymen.)
None of this is to denigrate the worth of the workman screenwriter and the workman director. Every piece need not be high art, nor is it wrong to belong to a team that writes the next light-hearted summer fare. Everyone needs to eat. It is noble to be an artist as it is noble to be a workman. It is noble to create, no matter how small. Of course, films are prone to go through any number of writers and revisions, any number of directors and budgets – and the screenwriter must be applauded for his patience and resolve in weathering the myriad difficulties of the business. Does that make these practices correct? No. There is nothing more depressing than watching a painfully moulded piece of work lose its personality in superfluous editing and interjection just to fit a demographic.
The screenwriter writes the story, and stories are powerful objects – not mere commodities. Don't take that away. Fund partnerships. Fund genuine vision. Let the artists breathe!